Clear Creek HiLife
Clear Creek High School
League City, TX
Issue Date: Tuesday, April 02, 2013
Issue: beginning of April
Last Update: Friday, April 05, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, October 18, 2006 By Nadia Ahmed and Allie Hinga
In a recent procedure implemented at in the Clear Creek Ninth Grade Center students who arrive prior to the 7:10 am bell are required to proceed into either the cafeteria commons area or to the boy’s gym. The controversial aspect is that the students are separated by gender. The girls are directed to the cafeteria and the boys are required to go upstairs to the boy’s gym. Mr. Joseph Ruiz, associate principal of Clear Creek High School, was asked to do a press conference concerning his recent actions.
When asked about the motives behind the separation Ruiz assured that it was enacted solely as a solution to the overcrowding in the cafeteria. Due to the growing enrollment the number of students in the cafeteria clearly exceeds the 700-student limit set by the fire marshall. After 25 days of observation, administrators determined that a change needed to be made. Several different options were discussed, and it was decided that separating the students by gender would be the easiest to monitor, and the quickest to implement.
The safety of the students is Ruiz’s number one concern. As he stressed in his interview the over crowding increases the likelihood of accidents, and it is important to be prepared in a school with a large population like Creek. Ruiz was concerned that if there was a need to evacuate large areas, such as the cafeteria, students could get injured by the large amount of people trying to exit the building. Also, if a student were to get sick, or a fight was to break out, teachers would not be able to get to the scene in time to provide assistance. For these same reasons Ruiz foreshadowed that he may be implementing new procedures later in the year concerning lunches, buses, and seating in the mornings. Ruiz continuously stressed that any change that he would make in the future would, again be strictly out of concern for the safety of the students.
Ruiz further defended this act by saying that he had spoken with many students and none of them seemed to mind the separation. Students like A. Metwalli confirmed this. Metwalli said, “It doesn’t really bother me, but there’s still not enough room.” While students like Metwalli agree with Ruiz, others disagree and continue to argue otherwise.
S Ortiz said, “I don’t like it because I don’t get to talk with my guy friends. What’s the big deal about different genders in different places?”
Another freshman, J Sanders claims “It is totally unacceptable and outrageous,” and it appears that many others seem to accept the same point of view as Ortiz and Sanders, and feel that the new procedure is a punishment.
To those students who feel they have been wronged, Ruiz would like to assure them that this and any other measure he takes is done strictly for the safety of the student. In fact, Ruiz considers this one of the least drastic measures possible. Ruiz said that this was “Since 90-92 percent of students already had chosen to separate themselves by gender before the policy had been implemented.”
For those who continue to disagree, Ruiz says that any student is free to come to him with any questions that they may have. However he would like to say to all freshmen students, “ There are some battles to fight, and some not to fight,” and he claims that this is not a battle worth fighting. In spite of that, it is up to students to choose their battles.
|
Back to the articles list
|
|
|
ADD YOUR COMMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Tue, Jan 11, 2005
January 2005
- Fri, Nov 25, 2005
November Print edition 2005
- Thu, Dec 15, 2005
December 2005 pdf
- Sun, Feb 05, 2006
Early February pdf
- Wed, Apr 12, 2006
April 2006 pdf
- Tue, Oct 10, 2006
October print edition
- Mon, Nov 27, 2006
NOVEMBER PRINT
- Fri, Dec 01, 2006
DECEMBER PRINT 2006
- Wed, Mar 28, 2007
March print edition
- Tue, Oct 02, 2007
Sept/Oct2007
- Wed, Oct 03, 2007
Oct/Nov 2007 Print
- Thu, May 04, 2006
Senior Edition May 2006
- Fri, Feb 02, 2007
January/February Print edition
- Fri, Sep 04, 2009
September 09 print
- Sun, Oct 04, 2009
Print October 2009
- Sun, Jan 03, 2010
December 2009
- Wed, Feb 03, 2010
Jan/Feb 2010 print
- Sun, Mar 07, 2010
March print 2010
- Sun, Apr 25, 2010
April Print
- Thu, Sep 16, 2010
October 2010 pdf
- Fri, May 18, 2012
May 2012 print
|
|
|
|
|