|
|
|
|
Friday, March 23, 2007 By SAMUEL CHOO, Editor In Chief
Advertising
Fairfax students saw both sides of a controversial topic, the Iraq War, at a two hour assembly that brought together antiwar activists from Arlington West and recruiters from the United States Marine Corps representing the pro-war side. Thirteen history teachers brought their students and most brought two classes each.
"The purpose of the assembly was to show two sides to the war in Iraq and whether students should join the army or not... I believe it brought up important issues," said Mr. John Collier, the organizer of the assembly.
The assembly began with a video called Arlington West. Shortened from 76 to 25 minutes, it showed interviews with people present at the weekly memorial held near the Santa Monica Pier. The movie showed both sides, despite a clear bias against the war. The movie also addressed the fact that "the military is everywhere" and that No Child Left Behind mandates that schools give students' personal information to military recruiters.
“[The video] was emotional and I don’t like the war, but if no one is willing to fight, who would do it?” said junior Marquis Nicholas,
After the video, the military recruiters presented a Power Point presentation consisting of pictures of soldiers fighting. The recruiters made comparisons to the lives of young Americans in the United States to the lives of soldiers that are overseas. The presentation brought some uproar as students began to question the validity of the facts presented by the supporters of the war.
“They (supporters of the war in Iraq) only showed the good parts. Come on now, it was totally biased," said Justin Bernard, 11th grade.
Students questioned the effectiveness of the presentation. “The slide show was not as powerful as the first presentation," said junior Jonathon Amazeg.
After the presentations by both sides, the panel discussion began. Sgt. Dana Varab, Sgt. Martenson, and Mark Del Maestro, who had previous military experience, represented the pro war side. On the anti war side was Marciela Guzman, James Patterson, Helga Aguyo, and Fernando Suarez Del Solar. The student questions led the panel to the focus on two major points: educational opportunities promised by the military and the ethical reasons for entering war. Both sides passionately defending their stance on the war, leaving students to decide the issue for themselves.
Marciela Guzman, a soldier who fought in the war and an opponent to the Iraq War, was a member of the panel on stage and after the assembly stated the importance of the assembly and was amazed by the interest students had about the war. “Students had amazing questions." She said "The students demonstrated a strong knowledge of world events and showed with passion their beliefs. Even though this assembly was very emotional for me and other members alike, facts had to be addressed so the American people can make a fair judgment about what is going on."
However, despite the large support by faculty for the Iraq War assembly, some teachers opposed the assembly. One of them, history teacher Mr. Robert Read, stated that the assembly failed to be a fair debate. "The groups against the war in Iraq are political groups who have opinions regarding the war," said Mr. Reed. "However, the military is not a political group. The cannot express their support for the war. The military following commands given by the Commander in Chief."
Mr. Read felt distraught by the fact that even after the assembly, handouts in opposition to the war was given to students. He felt that the students had established a view based on a biased presentation.
The assembly nevertheless challenged students to question their various beliefs about the war.
|
Back to the articles list
|
|
|
ADD YOUR COMMENT
|
|
|
|
Mrs. Jamie O'Halloran Whitmarsh
Adviser
Email Me
|
- Fri, Oct 06, 2006
Vol. 132 #1
- Wed, Nov 01, 2006
Vol. 132 #2
- Wed, Dec 06, 2006
Vol. 132 #3
- Mon, Oct 15, 2007
Vol. 133 #1
- Wed, Nov 28, 2007
Vol. 133 #2
- Wed, Jan 30, 2008
Vol. 133 #3
- Fri, Mar 28, 2008
Vol. 133 #4
- Thu, May 01, 2008
Vol. 133 #5
- Mon, Jun 16, 2008
Vol. 133 #6
- Wed, Oct 08, 2008
Vol. 134 #1
- Mon, Nov 17, 2008
Vol. 134 #2
- Wed, Jan 14, 2009
Vol. 134 #3
- Mon, Nov 02, 2009
Vol. 135 #1
- Thu, Apr 30, 2009
Vol. 134 #4
- Wed, Dec 16, 2009
Vol. 135 #2
- Wed, Feb 03, 2010
Vol. 135 #3
- Mon, Jun 16, 2008
Vol. 133 #6
- Mon, Jun 16, 2008
Vol. 133 #6
- Wed, Jun 17, 2009
Vol. 134 #5
- Wed, Jun 17, 2009
Vol. 134 #5
- Wed, Jun 17, 2009
Vol. 134 #5
- Mon, Mar 22, 2010
Vol. 135 #4
- Fri, May 14, 2010
Vol.135 #5
- Mon, Jun 14, 2010
Vol. 135 #6
- Fri, Dec 17, 2010
2010 Holiday Edition
- Thu, Feb 17, 2011
Volume 136 No. 4
- Fri, Jun 17, 2011
Vol. 136 no. 8
- Fri, Jun 17, 2011
Vol. 136 no. 8
|
There are currently 29 editions on-line. Click on edition name to view articles.
- Fri, Jun 17, 2011
Vol. 136 no. 8
- Thu, Feb 17, 2011
Volume 136 No. 4
- Fri, Dec 17, 2010
2010 Holiday Edition
- Mon, Jun 14, 2010
Vol. 135 #6
- Fri, May 14, 2010
Vol.135 #5
- Mon, Mar 22, 2010
Vol. 135 #4
- Wed, Feb 03, 2010
Vol. 135 #3
- Wed, Dec 16, 2009
Vol. 135 #2
- Mon, Nov 02, 2009
Vol. 135 #1
- Wed, Jun 17, 2009
Vol. 134 #5
- Thu, Apr 30, 2009
Vol. 134 #4
- Wed, Jan 14, 2009
Vol. 134 #3
- Mon, Nov 17, 2008
Vol. 134 #2
- Wed, Oct 08, 2008
Vol. 134 #1
- Mon, Jun 16, 2008
Vol. 133 #6
- Mon, Jun 16, 2008
Vol. 133 #6
- Mon, Jun 16, 2008
Vol. 133 #6
- Thu, May 01, 2008
Vol. 133 #5
- Fri, Mar 28, 2008
Vol. 133 #4
- Wed, Jan 30, 2008
Vol. 133 #3
- Wed, Nov 28, 2007
Vol. 133 #2
- Mon, Oct 15, 2007
Vol. 133 #1
- Fri, Jun 15, 2007
Vol. 132 #7
- Mon, Apr 23, 2007
Vol. 132 #6
- Thu, Mar 08, 2007
Vol. 132 #5
- Tue, Jan 30, 2007
Vol. 132 #4
- Wed, Dec 06, 2006
Vol. 132 #3
- Wed, Nov 01, 2006
Vol. 132 #2
- Fri, Oct 06, 2006
Vol. 132 #1
|
|
|
|
Advertising
|
|