Tiger Review
Tahlequah High School
Tahlequah, OK
Issue Date: Wednesday, May 01, 2013
Issue: May 1, 2013
Last Update: Wednesday, May 15, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monday, March 22, 2010 By Kailey Perry
Advertising
Oklahoma is now considering teaching a Bible class as an elective in public schools, anywhere from kindergarten to high school. According to newsok.com, “House Bill 2321 would authorize the Board of Education to adopt guidelines for the nonsectarian, nonreligious academic study of the Bible.” I am against this. It is really bad, in a multitude of ways.
When you think about this, you are likely to think that people will be trying to force their religion on students. This is unlikely to happen because high schooler’s beliefs are already deeply rooted within them and a Bible course will not likely indoctrinate them. Unfortunately, a Bible class will likely make them think and talk about those such beliefs and may break friendships and other relationships. When you find out your girlfriend is an atheist when you pray every day during the moment of silence may mess up your trust in her. I’m not sure why but some people think other’s morals are not as good as theirs if they don’t come from their personal deity.
There is also the issue of separation of church and state. This should not be too much of a problem, seeing as that this class is not meant to be teaching religious doctrine as much as it is history and literature. This is Oklahoma, though, which is smack dab in the middle of the Bible Belt. I have teachers that, given the opportunity, would most definitely bring their own beliefs into it, which is indubitably a violation of the first amendment. Separation of church and state is that the government, nor any of its representatives, like public school teachers, is to express a preference for any religion or religion over no religion. Don’t tell me you cannot think of anyone who would go against that.
Another thing is equality. If you are going to teach about Christianity, even if it isn’t really Christianity but just a document out of which it grew, you also must teach other religions, such as Judaism, Satanism, Islam and Hinduism. The only other religion that is readily taught at secondary schools is that of the ancient Greeks, when reading Homer’s “Iliad” and “Odyssey.” Although, that religion is often taken as complete and total fiction and that the people who practice it are crazy idiots. I don’t see why. Why is Christianity any more legitimate than the religion concerning Zeus and Aphrodite? Is it because no one supposedly practices it anymore, that the majority decides reality?
The Bible should not be taught in schools. There will not be any equality, it could break friendships, and it will turn into a sermon. Who wants any of that to happen? Well, I guess the Sunday schoolers would like learning about their ‘heroes,’ every day of the week, but I doubt any one else would really enjoy hearing even more about mythology than Mrs. Searcy’s two book recommended daily dosage.
| |
Back to the articles list
|
|
|
ADD YOUR COMMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Fri, Sep 01, 2006
September 2006
- Sun, Oct 01, 2006
October 2006
- Wed, Nov 01, 2006
November 2006
- Fri, Dec 01, 2006
December 2006
- Mon, Jan 01, 2007
January 2007
- Thu, Feb 01, 2007
February 2007
- Thu, Mar 01, 2007
March 2007
- Tue, Apr 17, 2007
April 2007
- Thu, May 17, 2007
May Issue
- Tue, Sep 18, 2007
Sept. 18, 2007
- Mon, Oct 22, 2007
October 22, 2007
- Thu, Nov 15, 2007
November 15, 2007
- Mon, Dec 10, 2007
December 2007
- Tue, Feb 05, 2008
January 2008
- Mon, Mar 03, 2008
February 2008
- Sat, Mar 15, 2008
March 2008
- Sun, Apr 20, 2008
April 2008
- Sun, Sep 28, 2008
September 2008
- Fri, Oct 31, 2008
October 2008
- Tue, Nov 25, 2008
November 2008
|
There are currently 66 editions on-line. Click on edition name to view articles.
- Tue, Apr 02, 2013
April 2, 2013
- Mon, Mar 11, 2013
March 11, 2013
- Tue, Feb 05, 2013
February 2013
- Fri, Jan 04, 2013
January 4, 2013
- Mon, Dec 03, 2012
December 3, 2012
- Thu, Nov 08, 2012
11/08/2012
- Mon, Oct 01, 2012
Oct. 1, 2012
- Thu, Sep 06, 2012
September 6, 2012
- Mon, Aug 20, 2012
August 2012
- Thu, Apr 05, 2012
April 2012
- Tue, Feb 14, 2012
February 2012
- Tue, Jan 03, 2012
January 3, 2012
- Thu, Dec 08, 2011
December 8, 2011
- Wed, Nov 09, 2011
November 2011
- Mon, Oct 24, 2011
Oct. 2011
- Tue, Sep 27, 2011
September 27,2011
- Thu, Aug 25, 2011
August 2011
- Tue, May 03, 2011
May 3, 2011
- Mon, Apr 11, 2011
April 11, 2011
- Mon, Mar 07, 2011
March 7, 2011
- Mon, Feb 21, 2011
February 2011
- Mon, Jan 24, 2011
January 2011
- Thu, Dec 02, 2010
December 2010
- Fri, Oct 29, 2010
November 2010 part 1
- Fri, Oct 15, 2010
october 15, 2010
- Wed, Sep 22, 2010
Sept. 22, 2010
- Mon, Aug 23, 2010
August 2010
- Thu, May 06, 2010
May 2010
- Thu, Apr 01, 2010
April 1, 2010
- Wed, Mar 10, 2010
March 10, 2010
- Thu, Feb 18, 2010
02/18/2010
- Wed, Jan 27, 2010
Jan. 27 2010
- Tue, Dec 15, 2009
Dec. 15, 2009
- Mon, Nov 30, 2009
November 20, 2009
- Thu, Nov 05, 2009
November 5, 2009
- Tue, Oct 27, 2009
October 27, 2009
- Wed, Sep 30, 2009
Sept. 30, 2009
- Wed, Sep 09, 2009
Tiger Review Sept. 9, 2009
- Fri, Aug 28, 2009
August 2009-2010
- Fri, May 22, 2009
May 2009
- Fri, Apr 24, 2009
April 2009
- Tue, Mar 31, 2009
March 31, 2009
- Thu, Mar 12, 2009
Feb/March
- Thu, Feb 12, 2009
Jan/Feb 2009
- Fri, Dec 19, 2008
Dec. 19, 2008
- Tue, Nov 25, 2008
November 2008
- Fri, Oct 31, 2008
October 2008
- Sun, Sep 28, 2008
September 2008
- Wed, May 14, 2008
May 2008
- Sun, Apr 20, 2008
April 2008
- Sat, Mar 15, 2008
March 2008
- Mon, Mar 03, 2008
February 2008
- Tue, Feb 05, 2008
January 2008
- Mon, Dec 10, 2007
December 2007
- Thu, Nov 15, 2007
November 15, 2007
- Mon, Oct 22, 2007
October 22, 2007
- Tue, Sep 18, 2007
Sept. 18, 2007
- Thu, May 17, 2007
May Issue
- Tue, Apr 17, 2007
April 2007
- Thu, Mar 01, 2007
March 2007
- Thu, Feb 01, 2007
February 2007
- Mon, Jan 01, 2007
January 2007
- Fri, Dec 01, 2006
December 2006
- Wed, Nov 01, 2006
November 2006
- Sun, Oct 01, 2006
October 2006
- Fri, Sep 01, 2006
September 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising
|
|