|
|
|
|
Wednesday, September 21, 2011 By David Morgan
President Blades' usual response to complaints about lack of a senior float. - David Morgan
Advertising
Homecoming
tradition has held strong for generations of Ross High School:
students are divided into grades, they build floats and are judged based
on several different categories.
But for a time (nearly the first three weeks of school), it didn’t look like
the senior class of Ross High School would have a place to build their yearly
class float at all. After much
debate and reluctance, through many discussions with administrators about
alternatives, they have finally been issued one. Prior to this development, I interviewed senior class president CJ
Blades to see how much effort he was putting into creating the float, as well
as finding a place to construct.
CJ said, “I think it’s a waste of money and
time. I feel that there are things
in this school that need to be changed.
Doing the same thing every year isn’t addressing the students’ needs and
wants.” CJ received $600 of class
funds for building materials at the beginning of the school year, but he had a
plan for that as well.
“I’m going
to spend some of it on homecoming and things the students actually want. Not a stupid float that no one cares
about that we lose every year,” Blades stated.
One might think that the reason for his overwhelming urge to
avoid building a float altogether came from the lack of a site, but Blades
assured me that it’s only partially because of there not being a place. “If
someone had offered to let us use a place I would have done it. I just don’t believe in it. I want to do stuff for homecoming and
stuff [sic]. Things people
actually care about.”
In a random survey of 95 seniors, 90 of them stated that they would much rather that the float not be built and that the money be used for Homecoming instead. One of the main reasons for their indifference was that “we lose every
year anyways”. Two of the five
opposing viewpoints came from regular float-constructors. Cody Wheeler said he thinks they’re the
only ones who would truly be upset by the absence of a float.
This
seemed to be the way things were heading until some of the teachers caught word
of the seniors’ plan. Ms. Farris, the Government teacher, stated that, “To some people... this is a huge deal. They
have solutions to not having a house, and you’re not going to like them.” Luckily, the seniors
were issued a building site by administrators in the absence of their own: the
old middle school parking lot.
I talked to new principal Mr. Martin and
queried his opinion on the topic.
He had a very calm and understanding demeanor as he said, “My stance is
that the float is part of tradition.
It’s been going on for a long time and it’s important to members of the
community. I understand the desire
to change that tradition for future years, however, those things take
time.” Mr. Martin seems to really
care about the students’ thoughts on the float. He also told me that he would take the seniors’ word into
consideration in the future.
This
is certainly a change of pace for us here at the high school. It isn’t very often that a portion of
the student body openly opposes a school tradition or rule and is actually
heard. It means we may actually be
seeing a change in homecoming tradition within the next few years, but for now
it looks as though things are going to stay the same.
| |
Back to the articles list
|
|
|
ADD YOUR COMMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are currently 43 editions on-line. Click on edition name to view articles.
- Wed, Apr 03, 2013
April 2013
- Fri, Mar 01, 2013
March 2013
- Thu, Jan 31, 2013
February 2013
- Tue, Jan 01, 2013
January 2013
- Thu, Nov 01, 2012
November/December 2012
- Wed, Oct 03, 2012
October 2012
- Wed, Sep 12, 2012
September 12, 2012
- Sun, May 20, 2012
May 24, 2012
- Wed, May 02, 2012
May 3, 2012
- Wed, Apr 11, 2012
April 11, 2012
- Wed, Feb 29, 2012
March 9, 2012
- Tue, Feb 14, 2012
February 17, 2012
- Thu, Feb 02, 2012
February 3, 2012
- Fri, Jan 13, 2012
January 13, 2012
- Fri, Dec 16, 2011
December 16, 2011
- Fri, Nov 11, 2011
November 18, 2011
- Fri, Oct 28, 2011
October 28, 2011
- Fri, Sep 30, 2011
September 30, 2011
- Fri, Sep 16, 2011
September 16, 2011
- Mon, May 23, 2011
May 23, 2011/ Final Edition
- Fri, May 06, 2011
May 6, 2011
- Wed, Apr 20, 2011
April 20, 2011
- Mon, Mar 28, 2011
March 28, 2011
- Fri, Mar 11, 2011
March 11, 2011
- Fri, Feb 11, 2011
February 11, 2011
- Fri, Jan 14, 2011
January 14, 2011
- Wed, Dec 22, 2010
December 22, 2010
- Fri, Dec 10, 2010
December 10, 2010
- Mon, Nov 22, 2010
November 22, 2010
- Fri, Nov 05, 2010
November 5, 2010
- Thu, Oct 21, 2010
October 22, 2010
- Fri, Oct 08, 2010
October 8, 2010
- Fri, Sep 24, 2010
September 24, 2010
- Sat, May 01, 2010
May 2010
- Thu, Apr 01, 2010
April 2010
- Mon, Mar 01, 2010
March 2010
- Mon, Feb 01, 2010
February 2010
- Fri, Jan 01, 2010
January 2010
- Tue, Dec 01, 2009
December issue
- Sun, Nov 01, 2009
November issue
- Thu, Oct 01, 2009
October issue
- Mon, Sep 14, 2009
September 2009
- Tue, Aug 25, 2009
Practice
|
|
|
|
Advertising
|
|