Trojan Tribune
Alisal High School
Salinas, CA
Issue Date: Wednesday, May 15, 2013
Issue: May 2013
Last Update: Tuesday, May 21, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, May 24, 2006 By Megan Aurajo
Advertising
Yes on 81
Remember Measure V earlier in the year? Its main goal was to raise funds through a half cent rise in the taxes to keep our libraries open. Proposition 81 does just that without the tax increase.
Proposition 81 will provide at the maximum of six hundred million dollars ($600,000,000) to strictly be used only to build or renovate libraries throughout California. After that, local communities will be responsible for the long-term maintenance and operation cost.
The funding for Proposition 81 does not come from our taxes; it is created with a combination of 65 percent state grants with 35 percent of locally generated funds.
Proposition 81 will expand libraries throughout California. These libraries will be used by many people, young and old. Ultimately it should increase the literacy rate of California residents by providing the materials, (newer books) and the ways, (newer libraries) and possible the means through the entertainment of feeding our imagination.
It’s true, there are a lot of people who have never stepped a foot into the library but what about the ones who have almost everyday, the ones who would rather read then to destroy their brain cells on television or hang out with the wrong crowd. What about them?
Proposition 81 will help keep the kids learning and safely keep them off the streets. Proposition 81 should pass. If you are not registered to vote, then I suggest that you inform your parents that on June 6th they will be able to vote for better libraries.
I encourage people to vote “YES” on 81
No on 82
Proposition 82 for the June 6th ballot has a great goal, but the process of getting there is very inefficient for California.
Proposition 82 is supposed to help preschoolers. It provides free preschool education for every 4-year-old who is a state resident by 2010. It will give the preschoolers a better chance to read earlier in life which will boost the achievement level of every child. In addition, the funding for proposition 82 will also be locked to only be spent on preschools.
Proposition 82 is meant to help the average preschoolers and ultimately help America as a whole in the future, however there is a great downside to is as well.
Proposition 82 will be adding a 1.7 percent increase to the income tax of Californian residents who earn $400,000 ($800,000 for married couples) or more a year. Even though that tax will not affect most residents in Salinas, It will affect many in California which will in return hurt our economy and will hurt us. Another downside of Proposition 82 is that it will only increase the preschool enrollment for 4-year-olds statewide from 64 percent to only 70 percent. A six percent increase (only 6 more kids out of 100) is minimal compared to the amount of money that will be taken out of California.
Proposition 82 will also give the state the power to dictate the philosophy and goals for every preschool. Parents will no longer have the ability to decide for their children whither or not the child will attend preschool for academic training or just to enhance the child’s social skills.
Ultimately I believe Proposition 82 is wrong for California. It cost too much for such a little change.
I encourage people to vote “NO” on 82.
|
Back to the articles list
|
|
|
ADD YOUR COMMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are currently 72 editions on-line. Click on edition name to view articles.
- Tue, Apr 23, 2013
April 2013
- Thu, Dec 13, 2012
December 2012
- Wed, Oct 31, 2012
october 2012
- Mon, May 21, 2012
May 2012
- Mon, Apr 30, 2012
April 2012
- Thu, Mar 22, 2012
Febuary 2012
- Mon, Jan 30, 2012
January 2012
- Wed, Nov 02, 2011
November 2011
- Fri, Sep 30, 2011
September 2011
- Mon, May 16, 2011
May2011
- Fri, Apr 01, 2011
April 2011
- Tue, Mar 15, 2011
March
- Wed, Jan 05, 2011
January 2011
- Mon, Nov 01, 2010
November 2010
- Thu, Sep 30, 2010
September 2010
- Mon, May 24, 2010
MAY 2010
- Tue, Mar 23, 2010
MARCH 2010
- Wed, Feb 10, 2010
Febuary 2010
- Thu, Dec 17, 2009
DECEMBER 2009
- Mon, Nov 16, 2009
November 2009
- Fri, Oct 30, 2009
October 2009
- Mon, Sep 28, 2009
September 2009
- Fri, May 01, 2009
May
- Wed, Apr 01, 2009
April
- Fri, Mar 27, 2009
March
- Sun, Feb 01, 2009
February 2009
- Fri, Jan 02, 2009
January Issue
- Wed, Dec 10, 2008
December2008
- Mon, Nov 24, 2008
November
- Tue, Oct 28, 2008
October 2008
- Tue, Sep 30, 2008
September 2008
- Wed, Jun 04, 2008
June 2008
- Wed, May 21, 2008
May 21, 2008
- Wed, May 14, 2008
May 2008
- Tue, Apr 01, 2008
April 1, 2008
- Fri, Mar 07, 2008
March 2008
- Sun, Dec 30, 2007
December 2007
- Fri, Nov 30, 2007
November 2007
- Mon, Oct 22, 2007
October 2007
- Tue, Jun 12, 2007
June 2007
- Fri, May 25, 2007
May 2007
- Sun, Apr 01, 2007
April 1, 2007
- Wed, Mar 28, 2007
March 2007
- Wed, Feb 28, 2007
February 2007
- Wed, Dec 13, 2006
December 2006
- Tue, Nov 28, 2006
November 2006
- Wed, Oct 18, 2006
October 2006
- Mon, Jun 12, 2006
June 2006
- Wed, May 24, 2006
May 2006
- Tue, May 09, 2006
May 2006
- Sat, Apr 01, 2006
April 1, 2006
- Mon, Mar 20, 2006
March 2006
- Mon, Feb 06, 2006
February 2006
- Thu, Dec 15, 2005
December 2005
- Tue, Nov 15, 2005
November 2005
- Thu, Sep 29, 2005
September 2005
- Tue, Jun 07, 2005
June 2005
- Thu, May 12, 2005
May 2005
- Fri, Apr 01, 2005
April 2005
- Tue, Mar 08, 2005
March 2005
- Tue, Jan 25, 2005
January 2005
- Wed, Dec 15, 2004
December 2004
- Fri, Oct 29, 2004
Oct 2004
- Mon, Sep 20, 2004
September 2004
- Fri, Jun 04, 2004
June 2004
- Thu, May 13, 2004
May 2004
- Thu, Apr 01, 2004
April 04
- Thu, Mar 18, 2004
March 2004
- Wed, Feb 25, 2004
February 2004
- Tue, Dec 09, 2003
January 2004
- Tue, Nov 18, 2003
November 2003
- Thu, Oct 09, 2003
October 2003
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising
|
|